IMMIGRATION LAW EXAM OUTLINE
Kaplan and O’Sullivan Summer ‘03

(STILES NUSL ’04)

Aliens
An alien is any person who is not a citizen or national of the US.
•	Persons who enter the US illegally, or who violate the terms of their admission to the US by working w/o authorization or by overstaying, are illegal aliens. 
•	Persons who enter the US lawfully for a temporary purpose are nonimmigrant aliens. 
•	Persons who are admitted to the US as LPRs ("green card" holders) are immigrant aliens. 
Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR)
An LPR is a foreign national who has been granted the privilege of permanently living and working in the US. Naturalization is the process by which an LPR applies for citizenship.

Status, Visa, and Unlawful Presence and Out-of-Status

Do not confuse w/ status w/ visa:  There are two components of "status"
1.  Classification under which the person is admitted (i.e. student, visitor, temporary worker, etc.);
2.  Duration the person is allowed to stay.
A person can change status into a new classification and may seek an extension for their stay.
The validity period for the VISA has nothing to do w/ the visitors permitted stay. 

"Unlawful presence" v. "out of status": 

A non-immigrant visitor violates their status if:
	(1) the person remains past the expiration date of the status granted
	(2) engages in employment w/o specific authorization
	(3) engages in activity that is not consistent w/ the status in which they were admitted
A person who violates status becomes removable at the moment of violation. If INS. becomes aware of a violation of status they can file an order to show cause (i.e. removal) against the person. If the violation of status is proven at a removal hearing, the person will be ordered removed.

"Unlawful presence" DOES NOT = "in violation of status." 
Generally speaking, a nonimmigrant is not "in unlawful presence" unless he remains longer than the period of stay explicitly granted on his or her form I-94. (An INS Form I-94, or Arrival-Departure Record, shows the date you arrived in the US and the "Admitted Until" date, the date when your authorized period of stay expires.) Even if they worked w/o authorization, they are only in "violation of status" not "unlawful presence." In the case of a student w/ "D/S", he or she will not be considered in "unlawful presence" even if the student stops going to school, works w/o permission, or otherwise violates status. The exception to this rule is in a case where the INS. has told the person that they are in unlawful status. At that point, and only at that point, does the person begin to accrue consecutive days in "unlawful presence."
A person who remains in the US in "unlawful presence" for more than 180 days and then departs voluntarily §240B, must remain outside the US for three years b/f being eligible to immigrate. A person who remains in "unlawful presence" for more than twelve months must remain outside for ten years.
VISA
A visa is a document that is issued by a US consular officer at an overseas consular office. While it is required for anyone who wishes to apply for entry into the US, it does not guarantee entry. The purpose of a visa is to demonstrate to the INS officer at the port of entry that the person holding the visa has been pre-screened and is eligible to be admitted into the US, temporarily, for a purpose that is consistent w/ the type of visa the person holds. HOWEVER, there are 27 countries whose citizens may travel to the US w/o a VISA (called VISA Waiver Countries).  
When a nonimmigrant alien remains longer than the authorized period of stay, their visa becomes void and may not be used again. AND, that person may only apply for future visas at their home consular post. 
Priority Dates
Certain aliens are subject to quota restrictions, and the law provides for an orderly waiting list, based on the date that the first official step was taken to immigrate the alien. For family based applicants, this is the date the INS first accepted the immigrant preference petition filed on the alien's behalf. For employment based applicants, this date is the earlier of the date a LC was filed on the alien's behalf, or the date an immigrant preference petition was filed, if no LC is required. This date is known as the alien's priority date.
Nonimmigrants
General requirements for foreign nationals seeking temporary admission include, but are not limited to, the following:
•	The purpose of the visit must be temporary; 
•	The foreign national must agree to depart at the end of his/her authorized stay or extension; 
•	The foreign national must be in possession of a valid passport; 
•	A foreign residence must be maintained by the foreign national, in most instances; 
•	The foreign national may be required to show proof of financial support; 
•	The foreign national must be admissible or have obtained a waiver for any ground of inadmissibility; 
•	The foreign national must abide by the terms and conditions of admission. 
Immigrants
All persons wishing to have the right to live and work in the US w/o restriction must qualify to immigrate and go through the formal immigration procedures. Immigrants to the US are divided into two categories:
1.  Those who may obtain permanent residence status w/o numerical limitation (unlimited immigrants), and 
2.  Those subject to an annual limitation. The latter category is further divided into 
•	family-sponsored, 
•	employment-based, and 
•	diversity immigrants.
	A. UNLIMITED IMMIGRANTS
1. Immediate Relatives: The spouse, widow(er) and minor unmarried children of a US citizen, and the parents of a US citizen who is 21 or older. (BUT SEE DERIVATIVES BELOW FOR LIMITATIONS!)
2.  Returning Residents: Previous US LPRs who are returning to the US after a stay of more than one year abroad.
	B.  LIMITED IMMIGRANTS
		1. Family-Based Immigration (FBI) (I-30)
To use FBI, you must have a relative who is a citizen or a LPR
			a.  Process
	(1)  INS must approve an immigrant visa petition I-30 (or is it a 130) "Petition for Alien Relative." The petition is file by the relative (sponsor) and requires  proof of relationship between the sponsor and requesting relative. 
	(2)  The State Dept. must determine if an immigrant visa (IV) is immediately available, even if the petitioner is already present in the US. If so, you can apply to have a number assigned, and check the status w/ the State Dept. to see when the number will become current.
	(3) If you are already in the US, you can apply to change status to LPR after the visa number is available to you. (This is one way to apply to secure a IV number.) (SEE NOTES FOR APP PROCEDURE).  If you are outside the US when the number becomes available, then you must go for consular processing.   
			b. Eligibility
~~ To Sponsor, you must be either a citizen or an LPR, and you must be able to show that you can support the immigrant at 125% of the poverty level (requires an "affidavit of support")
Preference relatives may receive all of the visas not used by Immediate Relatives, but no less than 226,000 visas per year. Family-based preferences (w/ minimum limits in parentheses):
"Highest" Preference: Immediate relatives (most advantageous category - not subject to quotas): parents, spouses, and children of US citizens. SEE ABOVE UNLIMITED IMMIGRANTS!
(1)  Gay spouse is ineligible, instead a visitor's visa is usually issued. 
		
(2)  Fraudulent Marriage (Sham Marriage):  Marriage must not only be legally entered into, but factually valid. Test: At the inception of the marriage, did the parties intend to establish a life together? Rodriguez v. INS (1st Cir. 2000).  Bi-lateral - when both parties intend fraud. Unilateral - when only one party intended to deceive INS. 
		
(3)  § 216(a)(1) and 216(g)(1) provide for a grant of "Conditional Permanent Residence" (CPR) for marriages of less than two years.  The couple must jointly petition to remove the condition within 90 days of the anniversary of the grant of CPR
		
(4)  Sham divorce can also occur in order to revert back to a more favorable status.  	
		
First Preference: Unmarried sons and daughters of US citizens, and children if any. (23,400, plus any visas the 4th preference applicants don't need, plus the amount (if any) by which the worldwide family sponsored ceiling exceeds 226,000) 
Second Preference: Spouses and unmarried minor (ANY AGE?) LPRs. "2As" (114,200, plus any visas the 1st pref. applicants don't need) 
Third Preference: Married sons and daughters of US citizens, and their spouses and children. "2Bs" (23,400, plus any visas the 1st and 2nd pref. applicants don't need) 
Fourth Preference: Brothers and sisters of US citizens, and their spouses and children, provided the US citizens are over 20. (65,000, plus any visas the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd pref. applicants don't need) 
b. Derivatives
Under INA § 203(d): any “spouse or child” who is “accompanying” or “following to join” an immigrant within any category will receive the same place in line as the principle. The spouse and child must be acquired b/f the principle’s admission as an LPR.
	
				c.  marriage
The spouse of a citizen whose heterosexual marriage was created within two years prior to being granted permanent residence is granted residence on a conditional basis. S/he is a full perm. resident in all respects--eligibility for employment, ability to travel freely in and out of the US, accumulation of time toward compliance w/ residence and physical presence requirements for naturalization as a US citizen--but that residence is subject to termination within two years after it is granted if the marriage has terminated by divorce or annulment during that period, or the marriage turns out to be a sham. MUST apply w/in 90 days of the 2 year deadline for the removal of condition.
Widows/Widowers qualify as immediate relatives for immigration under some circumstances. The alien must have been the spouse of the deceased citizen for at least 2 years and must not have been legally separated at the time of the citizen's death. The alien spouse must file an immediate relative immigrant visa petition within 2 years after the date of death and must still be unmarried at that time. 
Battered Spouses of citizens may also file their own immediate relative petitions. To qualify, the alien spouse must be a person of "good moral character," must have entered the marriage in good faith, must have resided in the US w/ the citizen spouse, and must have been battered or subjected to "extreme cruelty" by the citizen spouse. 
Eligible Children of citizens must be unmarried and under the age of 21 years. Children born in wedlock automatically qualify, and may be petitioned by either citizen-parent. Children born out of wedlock to citizen-mothers also qualify. A citizen-father may petition for his child born out of wedlock only if the child was legitimated prior to the age of 18 and the child is in the "legal custody" of the citizen-father, or the citizen-father has or had a bona fide parent-child relationship w/ the child. Adopted children may also qualify, but only if the adoption was finalized prior to the child's 16th birthday and certain procedural requirements w/ regard to the adoption have occurred. Stepchildren may qualify if the step relationship was established b/f the child's 18th birthday. 
Parents of citizens are eligible to immigrate as immediate relatives, but only if the citizen is 21 years of age or older. The citizen must be able to qualify as a child of the parent according to the rules just outlined, except of course that the citizen must be over the age of 21 and can be married. 
2. Employment-Based Immigration (I-40): See INA § 201, 203, and 204 and 8 CFR § 204.5
			a.  Process
(1)   Most employment based immigrants (EBI) requires LC (except 1st, 4th, and 5th priority).  Those not requiring LC, can skip to Step 2.
			i.  Labor Certification Process
Labor certification (“LC”) = statement from the US Dept. Labor (DOL) that a particular position at a particular company is "open" b/c no US workers who satisfy the minimum requirements for the job are available.  
To get LC, the alien must get offer a permanent offer from one, full-time US employer (multiple employers cannot combine). The alien cannot be admitted as a LPR, unless the employer obtains LC that qualified US workers are not available for the employment offered to the alien, and that the wages and working conditions offered will not adversely affect those of similarly employed US workers.
Exempted groups are the noted preference categories (e.g. outstanding ability - SEE BELOW) and pre-certified occupations, such as physical therapists and nurses.  Some outstanding university and college teachers and researchers in tenure-track jobs may avoid LC. Other college teachers and researchers may benefit from a fast-track form of LC called "special handling." 
Step 1: check Sched. A in 20 CFR § 656.10, which lists jobs pre-certified by Dept. of Labor (DOL) (currently nurses, PTs and immigrants w/ exceptional ability in the sciences). If listed, you can bypass LC and file directly w/ INS. If the job appears on Sched. B of 656.11, then additional showings will be required beyond the usual LC mandates (jobs include cab driver, nurses aids, parking attendants, etc.). 
Step 2:  Usually, no pre-cert is available and an individual application must be filed. The app. gets filed w/ the local office of state employment services (SES), which makes findings.  App. eventually goes to DOL where it's adjudicated by a Certifying officer (CO).  To get approved, the employer must document unsuccessful attempts to recruit American workers at prevailing wages. 
-  INA § 212(a)(5)(A) requires that the employer show that no “willing, able, and qualified” American workers are available - w/ certain exceptions. 
 - If the employer is too specific in their needs (i.e. this job requires a Korean speaking PhD), the employer will be required to show the requirement is a business necessity (BN). The test is: (1) whether the requirement bear a reasonable relationship to the occupation in the context of the employer’s business; and (2) that the requirements are essential to perform the work in a reasonable manner.  Matter of Tel-ko Electronics (ruling BN is shown where 95% of business conducted in Korean);   Matter of Marion Graham (holding family failed to show BN by providing only a letter explaining they needed a live-in domestic worker); Matter of Lucky Horse (holding non-English speaking workforce, as opposed to clientele, is not a BN).
- The employer may combine two functions is a single job if they can show that failing to do so would be so impractical as to be unfeasible. Matter of Chinese Community Theatre.  
-  The DOL will scrutinize wages.  Wage must be w/in 95% of the average listed for the job in that locale.
-  Zeigler Memo: In previous Reduction in Recruitment (RIR) was possible; employer could provide ads and show no one responded. The memo says that the DOL will take into account what it knows about the market. 
Step 3:  If the CO finds all requirements met, then the LC is issued. Otherwise, a "Notice of  Findings" is given to explain probs. and applicant is given 35 days to cure.  If response is insufficient, or none is made, the app. is denied.  

NOTES on LC:  The process can take two years and congress has allowed AOS applicants who've waited >180 days to change to another employer or job "in a similar occupational field" w/o need of INS or DOL approval. "National Interest" waiver (203(b)(2)(B)), allows applicant to skip LC.  

Other Labor Important LC Facts

(a) You must have 1 full-time employer to hire you.  You can’t pool several people together to sponsor you.  For example: several students couldn’t get together to sponsor a piano teacher.  Although, they could form a small corporation to do it (although it would have to be going for a while - start-ups often have trouble w/ this. 

(b) You can apply for a family and employment visa at the same time. Suppose you have a person in a job, and that person gains experience working in that job - the employer cannot then require two years experience for that same job.  The idea is that the job didn’t require it when the person started, thus it shouldn’t now.  You may be able to say that the responsibilities have expanded to require the added experience. 
(2)  Once LC is issued (or not necessary), the applicant must file an Immigrant Preference petition. Most petitions requires a sponosoring employer.  Some permit "self-petition."  Regardless, until the petition is filed and approved, the process cannot go forward. 
(3)  Following approval of petition, the immigrant must wait until the "Priority Date" is "current."  this date is the earlier of the date a LC was filed on the alien's behalf, or the date an immigrant preference petition was filed, if no LC is required. 
(4)  When the visa is available, the applicant has a choice of either or two paths to make the application for LPR:  
1. Consular Immigration Visa Processing (EXPLAINED JUST BELOW!)
			or
2.  Adjustment of Status (EXPLAINED JUST BELOW!)
		b.  Preference
A total minimum of 140,000 immigrant visas yearly are available for this category which is divided into five preference groups (percent of yearly limit):
1st Preference (E1) - Priority Workers: Persons of extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics; outstanding professors and researchers; and certain multinational executives and managers (28.6% (40,000), plus any 4th and 5th preference don't need). No labor certification (LC) is required for this category, saving about a year in the process!
-  Includes inter-company transferees (L-1A).
-  To come via the executive category, you'll need have worked for at least 1 year as an executive, or 6 months for certain very large corporations.
-  For extraordinary ability, no specific job offer is necessary, so long as they plan to work in their field of notoriety. This group can self petition. 
-  Outstanding professors and researchers w/ 3 years experience.  No LC, but employer must  offer job and file petition.
-  Certain executives and managers w/ 3 years experience. Must be coming to work to work in managerial or executive capacity. No LC required, but employer must provide job offer and file petition. 
2nd Preference (E2) - Members of the Professions: Professionals holding advanced degrees, and persons of exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, and business (28.6%, 40,000, and visas unused by the 1st preference). Requires LC! 
-  Requires LC and job offer - which can be waived if the alien shows that an exemption is in the "National Interest"  (?? HOW??) 
- Professional holding an advanced degree (beyond BA) or a BA plus 5 years progressive experience. (example: lawyer or social worker) 
- Persons w/ exceptional ability in the arts, sciences, or business.  Includes those w/ a degree of expertise "significantly" above that normally encountered in the field.
3rd Preference (E3) - Professionals, Skilled, Unskilled Workers and workers can demonstrate their labor is needed ("other workers"): Professionals holding baccalaureate degrees, skilled workers w/ at least two years experience, and other workers whose skills are in short supply in the US (28.6%, 40,000, plus visas unused by 1st and 2nd pref.-- but  no more than 10,000 "Other  Workers").
-  Requires LC!
-  Professionals are those jobs that usually require a BA.
-  Skilled workers are persons capable of performing a job requiring at least two years' training or experience.
- Other workers are people able to fill jobs requiring less than 2 years' training or experience. Waitress, for example. Only 10,000 (7.1% of grand total) such visas may be issued under this preference
-  Note: The DOL has flagged certain occupations which will require additional showings beyond those usually required. They are listed on Schedule B of 20 CFR 656.11 - e.g. parking attendants, nurses aids, cab drivers. 
4th Preference (E4) - Special Immigrants: Certain religious workers, ministers of religion, certain international organization employees and their immediate family members, and qualified, recommended current and former US Government employees. (7.1%). 
-  No LC is required
-  This preference is not allowed to take overflow from other preferences.
-  Only 10,000 per year.
5th Preference (E5) - Employment Creation/Entrepreneurs: Persons who create employment for at least ten unrelated persons by investing capital in a new commercial enterprise in the US. The minimum capital required is b/t $500,000 and $1,000,000, depending on the employment rate in the geographic area (7.1%).  Business investment must employ at least 10 Americans. 
-  No LC required.
-  Very seldom used, most w/ this background go in the 1st Preference.
		3. Diversity Immigrant Visa Lottery  - N/A

The LPR Application
Whichever of these three paths is chosen (family, employment, or diversity) the basic processing procedures are the same. Once the applicant has qualified, the prospective immigrant must next formally apply for immigrant ("LPR" or "green card") status. Depending upon where the applicant is physically located, and whether the applicant qualifies for both, the applicant may elect either of two procedures for applying for immigrant status:
1.  Consular Immigrant Processing: 2 definite advantages. First, relatively short processing time from start to finish. Unlike adjustment of status, consular processing rarely takes more than four to six months from the date of the petition approval. Second, the risk of refusal is significantly lower than the risk of denial of an application for adjustment of status. There are fewer grounds upon which a denial may be based and consular officers may not deny immigrant visas in the exercise of discretion (unlike nonimmigrant visas and adjustment of status). The obvious disadvantage is that the immigrant may need to travel. 
2.  Adjustment of Status: (AOS) permits certain people in the US to apply for LPR ("green card") status w/o having to go abroad. Not everyone qualifies for this procedure. Those that do must apply w/ an office of INS, where all further processing occur. AOS is discretionary!  It is possible for a person who is technically eligible for immigrant status to  be denied adjustment of status in the exercise of discretion. The most common instances of such discretionary denials involve cases where the applicant abused the nonimmigrant process.
a.  S. 245(c) limits AOS eligibility.  The following are not AOS eligible!		
b.   Discretionary Denials of AOS - AOS Applicants must not only prove that they have been "in status" at all times that they have been in the US since 1987, but also that they have not acted in bad faith in entering. The INS use the "30/60" rule when examining events that occur shortly after entry. If a person applies for admission into a school or for a change in nonimmigrant status within 30 days of entry, they are presumed to have acted in bad faith. That is, they had the preconceived intent to make the change and they used an easier to obtain visa in order to evade the normal screening process abroad for the visa they really wanted. If the application for adjustment of status occurs b/t 30 and 60 days after entry, no presumption is made, but there is a strong suspicion that the person may have acted in bad faith. The case will be scrutinized carefully. If the application occurs more than 60 days after entry, the presumption is that the applicant acted in good faith. Discretionary AOS refusals are not subject to administrative review. 
	Employment based immigrants only have to prove that their last entry b/f filing for AOS was lawful and that they have not accumulated a total of more than 180 days out of status since that entry. This benefit is contained in Section 245(k) of the INA. These benefits are not available to family based quota immigrants.
c.  AOS: 
Advantage: AOS applicant doesn’t need to leave. Important to applicants who accumulated >180 days in "unlawful status" and subject to 3 year exclusion upon departure from the US. For such people, who are also eligible to file for AOS under the "grandfathering" provision of Section 245(i) (allowing payment of the $1,000 fine - now expired for cases post 4/30/01), this is their only real option. 
Disadvantage: AOS is the discretionary decision making authority of INS officers. Where one officer may see nothing, another may see preconceived intent or presumed fraud.  Anything that would result in a denial of an application for an immigrant visa at a consul automatically requires a denial of an application for AOS in the US. ALSO, there are several independent grounds that require the denial of an AOS application, but not the denial of a consular immigrant visa application. On a per capita basis, denials of AOS were about fifteen times greater than denials of consular immigrant visas during fiscal year 1998. For the first three quarters of fiscal year 1999, the number of per capita denials has grown to twenty five times greater.
3.  Visa Ineligibility and Waivers: Criteria for ineligibility includes:
Admissibility is an issue at all stages of the immigration process:  (1) consulate (during visa application process; (2) admission or entry; (3) adjustment of status; (4) removal (alien was inadmissible under grounds they failed to disclose). 
NOTE: Aliens found either “inadmissible” (exclusion at a point of entry or during consular processing or a later determination that the alien was inadmissible at time of entry) or “deportable” (refers to removal after arrival) and who fail to get any “discretionary relief” are removed.  Everything is now called “removal.”
~ Keep separate though:  A person “removed” from the interior is subject to a 10 year bar. Whereas a person inadmissible outside or at the boarder will not be.  However, the analysis is the same.
	Persons removable under § 212(a) include (See also the separate chart)
1.  persons who have a communicable disease, or have a dangerous physical or mental disorder, or are drug addicts; 
2.  have committed serious criminal acts, including crimes involving moral turpitude, drug trafficking, and prostitution or procuring; are terrorists, subversives, members of a totalitarian party or former Nazi war criminals; are likely to become public charges in the U. S.; 
3.  have used fraud or other illegal means to enter the US; or are ineligible for citizenship. Some former exchange visitors must live abroad 2 years. Willful misrepresentation that, if the actual facts were known, would cause a denial of entry. 
4.  Public charges. Sponsor must include an affidavit of support to show s/he can support the households at 125% of the poverty level.  Note: the gov. has significant discretion to deny even if 125% threshold is met. If they think it’s shaky, they’ll delay.   
5.  Inadmissibility on the grounds of inadmissibility. § 212(a)(9). If alien accumulates >180 days unlawful presence and they leave (say to attend an adjustment hearing at the consul) they will be inadmissible for 3 years.  If they accumulate >1 year, then they are inadmissible for 10 years – SUBJECT to a number of exceptions  and an extreme hardship waiver.  
If any of the above restrictions apply, it is sometimes possible to obtain a waiver and continue the immigration process. Waiver grounds include:
1. Catch-all wavier: There are three main criteria for determining whether to approve or deny a waiver application under the “catch-all” § 212(d)(3) of the INA (discretionary): 
a. The risk of harm to society if the applicant is admitted; 
b. The seriousness of the applicant's prior violations, if any; and 
c. The reason for wishing to enter the US. 
d. The INS also takes into consideration the amount of time that has passed since any criminal conviction occurred, type of disability, if any, and the probable consequences, if any, to the public interest of the US. 
NOTE: § 212(d)(3) will apply to all 212(a)’s except (1) those section w/ a built-in waiver provision (in which case see that provision for waiver) and (2) 212(a)(3) security grounds (i.e. security threats; terrorists; foreign policy; Nazis). 

2.  Crime Waiver § 212(h)  applies to (1) crimes of MT; (2) simple possession – weed . 30 gr.; (3) multiple criminal convictions that give rise to a combined sentence of >5 years, regardless of whether CMT or not; (4) prostitution; (5) aliens raising immunity from prosecution. No showing of hardship. SEE STATUTE for finer details!

3.  Health waiver § 212(g)  applies to spouses and unmarried sons or daughter of citizens and LPRs.  No showing of hardship necessary.

4.	Fraud and Willful Misrep. waiver § 212(i) applies to spouses and unmarried sons or daughter of citizens and LPRs.  Requires a showing of hardship, or extreme hardship depending on the degree of the offense. 

5.	Document and LC waiver § 212(k) applies to cases where the alien was inadmissible due to docs. and LC problems, but could not have known so in the exercise of “reasonable” diligence b/f the time of departure. Not a waiver, but discretionary relief. 

4.  Admissions Procedures (at the boarder or ports of entry)

a.	Person arrives > agent notices they have fraudulent docs (or some other violation) > they will be asked if they have a fear of returning home (if no, then on next flight out) > if yes, they will get a “credible fear” hearing (very low standard) > if the officer finds “no credible fear,” the alien can get review by IJ (if upheld, home on next available flight) > if credible fear is found, then person will be held w/o bond for a formal asylum hearing. 
b.	Note: if caught in the interior, the burden is on the government. At the airport, the alien has the burden.
c.	§ 101 defines admission as lawful entry after inspection and authorization.
d.	If caught at the airport, there is no right to bond (there is in the interior). As a practical matter, the gov. will usually allow bond, especially where there is a 3rd party, unless person was stowaway.  

Removal Grounds

A.  “Removal”: Under the IIRIRA the single term that refers to the proceeding at which a non-citizen’s inadmissibility or deportability is decided. 
1.   The list of grounds under which noncitizens will be inadmissible is found under § 212(a): (see above).   
2.	The grounds for deportation are found under § 237(a), notably:

a.  Smuggling § 237(a)(1)(E) -  Under statute, you don’t have to show monetary gain. Note that you must have been in the US less than 5 years.  There is an exception/waiver for spouses and close relatives. A fiancé will not count.
b.  Marriage Fraud § 237(a)(1)(G): If you’ve been married for less than 2 years, then the burden is on the noncitizen. 
c.	Criminal Offenses § 237(a)(2)(i) “CMT”:  If (1) “convicted” within 5 years after the date of admission (10 yrs for LPR) of a CMT or (2) a crime for which a sentence of >1 may be imposed, regardless of time here.     
i.	CMT – Under Marciano, an “act of baseness, vileness, or depravity in the private or social duties which a moan owes his fellow man.” In Matter of Crammond, “did act accompany a vicious motive or a corrupt mind?” Where recklessness is an element, calling for a conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk, CMT will apply. In In re Sweetsir, the court found that where the statute is divisible (it has a violent and non-violent §.), it will depend which § the alien was convicted under.  
ii.	 CMT can only force removal if alien has been present in the interior for less than 5 yrs. or if it is a  2nd CMT offense. 
iii.  You don’t look at what they did, you look at the statute!
d.  Aggravated Felony § 237(a)(2)(ii) – Defined by § 101(a)(43)
i.   Commission of an aggravated felony (AF) is automatically deportable.  The list of AFs is much longer than one might assume.  There is no waiver for AFs, (subsequent to 1996 no waiver; prior to, you might be eligible).		
ii.   AF triggers automatic detention during removal proceedings § 236(c)(1)(B). 
iii.  If removed for an AF, alien may return w/o special permission from AG.  If caught, 20 yr. sentence!
iv.  AF is broadly defined to include many crimes. For example: any crime of violence carrying a 5 yr. sentence. 
v.   Theft, embezzlement, fraud, RICO, murder, rape, certain assaults and crimes against the person.   
d.  Failure to Register and Falsification of Documents § 237(3):  Must be “willful” failure.  The burden of proof on the government.  
e.  Security and Related Grounds § 237(4):  Terrorist activities as defined by § 212(a)(3)(B)(iii), etc.  
f.  Domestic violence. Anyone charged w/ DV is deportable.  See also § 237(7)(A). 

g.  Certain Firearms Offenses will make a person deportable. It will exempt the person from waiver under §240(a) relief.

3.  The breadth of the AGs power to grant discretionary relief is dependant on which two sets of grounds applies. 
4.  As noted above, regardless of the single term, “removal,” the grounds which apply will effect where the burden of proof lies, and it will effect how long a person who has been found deportable or inadmissible must wait b/f returning. Moreover, the constitutional rights of those in the interior will still exceed those at the ports.  Thus the line b/t exclusion and expulsion remains intact. 
5.  However, under IIRIRA, noncitizens who have entered but not been formally “admitted” - i.e. those who entered w/o formal inspection - are now considered “inadmissible” rather than deportable.  §§ 212(a)(6)(A), 235(a)(1). 
6.  Conviction = broadly defined to include any jury finding or plea or guilt (applies to all crimes not just AFs). States must report convictions to the INS or lose drug control funding. If a conviction is withdrawn for immigration grounds, the person will remain deportable. Thus, it’s only possible to try and claim you didn't give a knowing waiver for pleas agreement or ineffective assistance.
7.  US v. Parrino: Surprise at deportation is not enough w/o a showing of professional misconduct by the Δ’s attorney.  That fact of deportation as a collateral consequence not enough.
8.	INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, exclusionary rule will not apply to deportation b/c it is a civil matter. 

B.	There is no res judicata or any other doctrine that will protect a person. It’s not over until you become a citizen - unless you get citizenship on fraudulent grounds. 

C.  Basic Procedure, Burdens, Evidence, and Misc.
1.  INS prosecutes noncitizen (defendant). 
2.  INS serves a Notice to Appear, (similar to a indictment or information). It alleges facts and statutory grounds for inadmissibility. A Justice Dept. official, called an IJ, will preside over the removal hearing. 
3.  Under § 240(c), (1) INS has initial burden to show by clear and convincing evidence (CCE) that respondent is a non-citizen; (2) if shown, burden shifts to resp. to show by CCE that s/he is here lawfully; (3) then, burden shifts back to INS to prove alleged deportability grounds by CCE; (4) if shown, the alien will have the burden of establishing eligibility for any relief.
a.	If seeking admission (not removal) the alien has the high burden of showing s/he is clearly and beyond doubt entitled to admission.
4.  Rules of evidence do not apply.  Threshold is relevancy and fairness is usually applied. 
5.  The  IJ will determine whether the person is (A) a noncitizen and if so (B) whether the noncitizen fits into one or more of the alleged deportability grounds. 
6.  If found deportable, the IJ will next decide whether the individual is eligible for or deserving of any affirmative discretionary relief that s/he has applied for (empowered to offer the discretionary relief discussed above.)
7.  If IJ finds alien “not deportable,” proceedings are terminated.  If deportable, and disc. relief denied, the IJ will issue removal order. If the judge finds the person deportable, but grants some relief, the judge may either terminate the proceedings or offer voluntary departure (SEE ABOVE).
8.  Either INS or alien may appeal to the BIA. The alien, but not INS can obtain judicial review of BIA decision by filing a “petition for review” directly to applicable US Ct. of Apps.  INA § 242(a)(1). Rules of evidence don’t apply.  Principle is whether the evidence is fundamentally fair and probative. They are developed by case law.
9.  Fleuti (US 1963) Some courts still uphold the Fleuti rule: “an innocent, brief, and casual excursion by the an alien outside the boarders will not disrupt alien status.”  It basically depends whether the alien intended to engage in behavior that would disrupt their status. 

D.  Cancellation of Removal § 240A
1.  AG may cancel removal for:   (a)(1) LPRs present for >5 years, (a)(2) has resided on the US continuously for 7 yrs, and (a)(3) has not been convicted of an AF.  
2.  AG may cancel removal and allow AOS for an LPR who has (b)(1)(A) been present for at least 10 yrs. preceding application date, (b)(1)(B) been of good moral character, (b)(1)(C) not committed any 212(a)(2) offenses; and (b)(1)(D) establishes that removal would result in extremely unusual hardship to alien’s spouse, parent, or child who are citizens or LPRs. 
3.  AG may cancel for battered spouses subject to limitations of the 212(a) exceptions listed (See statute).
4.  See statute § 240A, which lists a number of aliens ineligible. 
	
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES
Source of Power:  Penumbras and emanations from the power to make war, treaties, suppress insurrection, repel invasion, regulate foreign commerce, secure republican governments to the states, admit aliens as citizens -- all are sovereign powers. CONGRESS HAS PLENARY POWER IN THE AREA OF IMMIGRATION! What congress wants, congress gets! Fiallo v. Bell (US 1977) (holding that congress's power to exclude is largely immune from judicial control).
Bail: In Kim (US 2003), the Court held that a person subject to deportation has no right to bail. According to O'Connor, Habeas only applies as it did in 1789, and immigration did not exist then
Due Process: In Reno v. American, the court held that once it is found that you're unlawfully present, you have no DP rights.  BUT SEE JUST BELOW!  An alien's DP rights will depend where you are. If you're in the US interior, you will have more DP. 
	- § 242(g) seems to remove all DP rights from aliens. Statute attempts to curtail the appeal rights of immigrants. 
Right to Hold an LPR in Captivity indefinitely:  The Mezei (US 1953) court, motivated primarily out of fear of the Red Scare, held that the continued exclusion and holding of an alien, w/o a hearing, as a security risk did not deprive the alien of any statutory or constitutional rights.  The court retreats from Mezei a bit in Landon v. Plasencia (US 1982), holding that LPRs who leave only briefly (Mezei was gone 20 months), and have "ties" to the US, have greater rights to DP.  In Zadvydas (US 2001) the court held 5-4 that the applicable statute does not authorize indefinite detention of a deportable non-citizen. 

ASYLUM AND WITHHOLDING

•	For asylum claims, the applicant must first show they are eligible by meeting the definition of “refugee,” (101(a)(42)), and then it’s up to the government to decide whether to give a discretionary grant of asylum.  For withholding, the applicant must only show they meet the definition and then withholding is granted.  Only asylum will allow an eventual change to LPR!
o	To meet definition of refugee, applicant must show: a well-founded fear of persecution, based on the (1) race, (2) religion, (3) nationality, (4) membership in a particular social group, or (5) political opinion. 
•	Note that “asylum” seekers are w/in the US trying to fit into the “refugee” definition.  “Refugees” are thought of as those outside the US trying to meet the definition b/f entry. 

•	Asylum must be sought w/in 1 yr. of arrival in the US, w/ limited exceptions (s. 208(a)(2)(B,D).  Hearing will happen w/in 45 days of application. IJ has 180 days to decide.  
o	1 year bar does not apply to withholding. 
o	Exceptions to 1 yr. bar include: (1) medical incapacity, (2) changed country circumstances, (3) ineffective assistance of counsel (difficult standard – requires bar complaint). 
o	Regardless, person must have filed w/in a reasonable time after the exceptional circumstance. 

•	A & W can be sought either “affirmatively” (w/o impetus) or “defensively” (to prevent removal). 

•	Although grounds of inadmissibility (GOI) don’t apply to withholding, they may have impact on the discretionary aspect of asylum.  Moreover, there are several absolute bars to asylum and withholding: 
(1)	persecution of others
(2)	firm resettlement (found where another country offered resettlement prior to US arrival)
(3)	“serious,” non-political crime (little law available on this)
(4)	security threat 
(5)	participation in a “serious” crime
(6)	Aggravated Felony (AF) – although only an AF w/ a sentence of >5 yrs. bars withholding
The GOI aren’t often used in the exercise of discretion to deny asylum, but repeated misconduct or lying to the judge might be enough to trigger it.  Thus, withholding should be sought contemporaneously. 

•	Note that there is a distinction b/t “prosecution” and “persecution.”  To show that pros. is actually pers., ask (1) was there a violation of the law? (2) Is the punishment proportionate to the crime?

•	Test for withholding: s. 241(b)(3) – The applicant must show that his/her life or freedom would be threatened. 

•	Credibility issues: Other credibility issues: (1) minor discrepancies in dates, especially related to the applicant’s language or typographical errors, cannot be viewed as bearing on credibility; (2) It is impermissible to hold the petitioners failure to marry the mother of his children against him; (3) An applicant’s failure to apply for asylum in other countries through which he passed provides no basis for questioning credibility. (4)  Ct. indicated that the possession of a passport was not a bar to refugee status b/c the possession of a PP is not necessarily evidence of loyalty to the government. Damaize-Job v. INS (9th Cir 1986).

•	Other Credible Sources: Other Sources of Information. 8 CFR § 208.12(a) allows reliance on other credible sources, such as international orgs., private voluntary agencies, news orgs., or academic institutions. These reduce dependence on State Dept. opinions.  The BIA will also take “administrative notice” of country conditions generally and changed conditions in particular.

•	Well-founded fear test for asylum: 

1.	Subjective/objective component: Well-founded fear is established if the reasonable person in the applicant’s circumstances would fear persecution.  Moreover, even where the feared persecution is not greatly probable, a reasonable person may have cause to fear.  Matter of Moghrabbi.  Look at others in that situation.  In Moghrabbi, a showing is made by looking at other students with similar views who were also persecuted.  Moghrabbi is the test, but much mention is still made to Acosta.

The Acosta ct. set up a 4-part test for reviewing asylum: (1) the alien possesses a belief or characteristic a persecutor seeks to overcome in others by means of punishment of some sort; (2) the persecutor is already aware, or could easily become aware, that the alien possesses this belief or characteristic; (3) the persecutor has the capability of punishing the alien; and (4) the persecutor has the inclination to punish the alien.  (The term “easily” in prong 2 was eliminated later in Moghrabbi. 

A well-founded fear of persecution contains both a subjective and an objective element. The former is established via the applicant's credible testimony that his fear is genuine; while the latter is largely dependent upon the context and believability he can establish for his claims through presentation of reliable, specific, objective supporting evidence.  Cordero-Trejos. 

In Montecino v. INS (9th Cir. 1990), the court held that a well-founded fear is made out when “on the basis of objective circumstance personally known to him, believes that he has at least a one in ten chance of being killed by guerillas.” See also Martirosyan v. INS (9th Cir. 2000).  

Past persecution.  (1) evidence of past persecution suffered by the applicant can help establish a well-founded fear of future prosecution; (2)  the definition of refugee INA § 101(a)(42) makes past pers. an independent basis for refugee status – even when  no future threat exists.  

-   Even though past pers. raises a presumption of future pers., it can be overcome by changed country circumstances. 
2.  Does the persecutor have the power to carry out threat?  Bolanos-Hernandez. 
•	Private parties can be the actors and government action can be implicated by the failure of the government to protect the individual or group the individual belongs to. Matter of Kasinga. 
3.  The 5 statutory grounds: 
i.  Political Opinion
•	Imputed political opinion.  Failing or declining to take sides dos not matter if the persecutor imputes his adversaries opinion to you.  “You’re either with us or against us” will impute belief.  Bolanos-Hernandez.  But see Elias-Zacarias (US 1992) holding that forced conscription does not necessarily constitute persecution on the grounds of political opinion. Thus, a greater need to attribute opinion to guerillas must be shown.  Some Circuits have yet to adopt Bolanos – including 1st Cir.
•	General rule against prosecution will not apply where the applicant is being prosecuted for the attempted overthrow of a lawfully constituted government where a coup is the only means of effecting political change.  Matter of Izatula. Prosecution here could have resulted in persecution. 
•	The ability to obtain a passport is no bar to refugee status.  Cordero-Trejos. 
•	Matter of DV was a rape case involving a Haitian women who was raped on account of her support of Aristead.  Thus, she was granted asylum on the grounds of political opinion. The UN has also recognized rape as a form of torture, so relief is also available under the torture conventions.
ii.   Membership in a Particular Social Group
•	Social group means shared, common, immutable characteristics.  Fatin. 
•	The IJ shall not require applicant to show he would be singled out individually for persecution if he establishes his inclusion in and identification w/ a similarly situated group of persons against which there is a pattern or practice of persecution in the country on account of any of the statutory grounds. Cordero-Trejos.
•	Often the 5 grounds will overlap – race, social group, religion, political opinion.
•	Homosexuality is treated as a social group.  1996 letter to INS attorney by Barney Franks that INS should not attempt to argue that being gay is not a social group.  In Tobosco-Alfonso, homosexuality was not treated as immutable, but being gay in Cuba was treated as immutable. 
•	Rape-related asylum claims need not arise out of social group. The can come from any of the protected grounds.
•	Matter of Kasinga – young women opposed to female genital mutilation (FGM) constitute a social group.  First case to dealing w/ private parties and not direct gov. action.  The action was found through a failure of the gov. to protect the group. 
iii.   Religion
iv.   Race
v.    Nationality
•	Gender-Based Asylum
In 85-87, there were two decisions Lazo-Majaro (9th Cir. said that a rapist was expressing a political opinion that he had the right to rape and abuse her and she was expressing an opinion that she had autonomy over her body) and Campos-Guardano (women was a land reform activist who was raped and all the while the rapists were shouting political matters – ct. called it a personal matter) that were very difficult to reconcile.

In Hernandez-Montiel, the 9th Cir. acknowledged that it was out of step.    They recognize that either Acosta or Trejio  are both acceptable standards. This is a case about a gay man with a female sexual orientation.  The 9th cir. addressed the issue of mixed motive.  The petitioner is not expected to  
prove all motives – s/he only needs to prove one motive.

See also notes above.

•	Other Protections

Convention Against Torture.  Only recently given legislative effect.  Art. 3.1 of the CAT states that no party shall return (refouler) or extradite a person to another state where there are substantial grounds for believing that the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture. 

Temporary Protected Status (TPS). Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is a temporary immigration status granted to eligible nationals of designated countries (or parts thereof). In 1990, Congress established a procedure by which the AG may provide TPS to aliens in US, temporarily unable to return to home b/c of ongoing armed conflict, environmental disasters, or other extraordinary and temporary conditions. During the period for which the AG has designated a country under TPS program, TPS beneficiaries are not required to leave US and may obtain work authorization.  TPS does not lead to permanent resident status. When the AG terminates a country's TPS designation, beneficiaries return to the same immigration status they maintained before TPS (unless that status had since expired or been terminated) or to any other status they may have acquired while registered for TPS. Accordingly, if an alien had unlawful status prior to receiving TPS and did not obtain any status during the TPS period, s/he will revert to that unlawful status upon the termination of TPS designation.
a.   Eligibility.  An alien who is a national of a country (or alien having no nationality who last habitually resided in that country) designated by the Attorney General is eligible to apply for benefits under the TPS program if he or she: (1) establishes continuous physical presence and continuous residence in the United States for a specified period of time; (2) is not subject to several criminal and security-related bars; and (3) timely registers for TPS benefits. If the Attorney General extends a TPS designation beyond the initial designation period, the beneficiary must timely re-register to maintain his or her benefits under the TPS program. 
b.  An alien is not eligible for TPS if s/he: (1) has been convicted of any felony or two or more misdemeanors committed in the US, (2) is a persecutor, terrorist or otherwise subject to one of several security-related bars to asylum; or (3) is subject to one of several criminal-related grounds of inadmissibility for which a waiver is not available.