<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blosxom to WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress</link>
	<description>Technology, law, and personal stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 01:22:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motherboard I&#8217;d Like to Fuck &#187; Helping a friend migrate from Blosxom to Wordpress</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress/comment-page-1#comment-4637</link>
		<dc:creator>Motherboard I&#8217;d Like to Fuck &#187; Helping a friend migrate from Blosxom to Wordpress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress/#comment-4637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] I use parentheses way too goddamn much. I&#8217;m going to investigate the two linked from codex (since they do seem to be the best) a little more, determine the differences, and go from there. Too bad python guy didn&#8217;t share his script, it might have imported categories properly, but maybe the ones that I haven&#8217;t looked into deep enough do as well, so&#8230; yeah. I&#8217;ll try to update this later (unlike forgetful Adam). [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I use parentheses way too goddamn much. I&#8217;m going to investigate the two linked from codex (since they do seem to be the best) a little more, determine the differences, and go from there. Too bad python guy didn&#8217;t share his script, it might have imported categories properly, but maybe the ones that I haven&#8217;t looked into deep enough do as well, so&#8230; yeah. I&#8217;ll try to update this later (unlike forgetful Adam). [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress/comment-page-1#comment-2773</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress/#comment-2773</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, I just finished doing a WP install for my work website. I&#039;m planning on moving PIHP over to WP in the next weeks. I&#039;d be interested to know what you did re: plugins and widgets and such.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I just finished doing a WP install for my work website. I&#8217;m planning on moving PIHP over to WP in the next weeks. I&#8217;d be interested to know what you did re: plugins and widgets and such.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chung-chieh Shan</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress/comment-page-1#comment-2771</link>
		<dc:creator>Chung-chieh Shan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress/#comment-2771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Eww! PHP!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eww! PHP!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Laniel</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress/comment-page-1#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Laniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2007/01/28/blosxom-to-wordpress/#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice! I look forward to skewering this transition in casual conversation with my friends, at those parties where we make fun of database-backed blogs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know that filesystem-only blogs are the trouble. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s possible to design such a thing and make it scale well. I just don&#039;t think Blosxom does it well. Partly that&#039;s because of the Blosxom Way -- namely, that it&#039;s the simplest conceivable layer above a filesystem, and that absolutely anyone could write a plugin to it. I&#039;ve been in discussions on the Blosxom list where people have rejected certain solutions because they complexify the code and make it less accessible to novice hackers. Anyone can write a Blosxom plugin with just a few minutes of reading about the blog package.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All that said: database-backed blogs are the way to go. They can be done badly, though, and WP has had some scalability problems that we encountered when running ThinkProgress. But since WP is the wave of the present, I presume its bugs are going to be fixed in time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! I look forward to skewering this transition in casual conversation with my friends, at those parties where we make fun of database-backed blogs.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t know that filesystem-only blogs are the trouble. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s possible to design such a thing and make it scale well. I just don&#8217;t think Blosxom does it well. Partly that&#8217;s because of the Blosxom Way &#8212; namely, that it&#8217;s the simplest conceivable layer above a filesystem, and that absolutely anyone could write a plugin to it. I&#8217;ve been in discussions on the Blosxom list where people have rejected certain solutions because they complexify the code and make it less accessible to novice hackers. Anyone can write a Blosxom plugin with just a few minutes of reading about the blog package.</p>

<p>All that said: database-backed blogs are the way to go. They can be done badly, though, and WP has had some scalability problems that we encountered when running ThinkProgress. But since WP is the wave of the present, I presume its bugs are going to be fixed in time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
