<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security and Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/01/29/security-and-privacy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/01/29/security-and-privacy</link>
	<description>Technology, law, and personal stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/01/29/security-and-privacy/comment-page-1#comment-4221</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/01/29/security-and-privacy#comment-4221</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fair point. I was only citing the EPIC page to show that the New Yorker&#039;s rather positive characterization of the Clipper chip was flawed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point. I was only citing the EPIC page to show that the New Yorker&#8217;s rather positive characterization of the Clipper chip was flawed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Thurston</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/01/29/security-and-privacy/comment-page-1#comment-4220</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Thurston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/01/29/security-and-privacy#comment-4220</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;EPIC&#039;s clipper chip page is outdated.  The Skipjack algorithm is now public, for instance.  I think public cryptographers are skeptical of the algorithm; there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skipjack_(cipher)#Cryptanalysis&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;attacks&lt;/a&gt; against almost the entire algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EPIC&#8217;s clipper chip page is outdated.  The Skipjack algorithm is now public, for instance.  I think public cryptographers are skeptical of the algorithm; there are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skipjack_(cipher)#Cryptanalysis" rel="nofollow">attacks</a> against almost the entire algorithm.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
