<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Much Simpler Fix for the r8169 &#8220;Link-Down&#8221; Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem</link>
	<description>Technology, law, and personal stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MetaYii</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-5203</link>
		<dc:creator>MetaYii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-5203</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With slamd64, kernel 2.6.29.4, it recognized the card, loaded the module, but ifconfig reported &quot;no such device&quot;. I came here and followed the hint, placing&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;/usr/sbin/ethtool -s eth1 autoneg off&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;at the beginning of the rc.inet1.conf file. It worked. I haven&#039;t tested in gigabit, because my desktop switch is 10 Mb., but I&#039;ll try later (I hope it gives me 1 gb).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With slamd64, kernel 2.6.29.4, it recognized the card, loaded the module, but ifconfig reported &#8220;no such device&#8221;. I came here and followed the hint, placing</p>

<p>/usr/sbin/ethtool -s eth1 autoneg off</p>

<p>at the beginning of the rc.inet1.conf file. It worked. I haven&#8217;t tested in gigabit, because my desktop switch is 10 Mb., but I&#8217;ll try later (I hope it gives me 1 gb).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-5177</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-5177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you!  I&#039;ve been searching for MONTHS on how to make my NIC built-in to my Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L motherboard work.  I&#039;ll still monitor the connection for a couple of days but so far, so good.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only better solution I can think of is if there was an option for the kernel module itself that would turn off auto negotiation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!  I&#8217;ve been searching for MONTHS on how to make my NIC built-in to my Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L motherboard work.  I&#8217;ll still monitor the connection for a couple of days but so far, so good.</p>

<p>The only better solution I can think of is if there was an option for the kernel module itself that would turn off auto negotiation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fremmed</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-5099</link>
		<dc:creator>Fremmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-5099</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just encountered this very situation on one of my boxen, and I think I may have some new information.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have two identical 8169 NICs (by C-net IIRC) and after about two weeks of continuous operation, with autoneg ON, running at gigabit, I suddenly get the link down problem, and have to turn autoneg off to get link detection again.  however, if I swap the NIC for another, identical, card, I get autoneg operation again, for another couple of weeks (I&#039;ll make a note of the exact time from now on), at which time the same problem develops, until I switch back to the NIC that stopped working the last time!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just encountered this very situation on one of my boxen, and I think I may have some new information.</p>

<p>I have two identical 8169 NICs (by C-net IIRC) and after about two weeks of continuous operation, with autoneg ON, running at gigabit, I suddenly get the link down problem, and have to turn autoneg off to get link detection again.  however, if I swap the NIC for another, identical, card, I get autoneg operation again, for another couple of weeks (I&#8217;ll make a note of the exact time from now on), at which time the same problem develops, until I switch back to the NIC that stopped working the last time!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plops</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-4917</link>
		<dc:creator>plops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-4917</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just installed a Slack12.2 on a laptop with said chipset : the 2.6.27.7-smp kernel wouldn&#039;t speak to the 100Base-T cable, mii-tool did not find anything...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well, in fact the &quot;workaround&quot; is stupid : just boot with the damned cable plugged !&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t do this normally because the box dual-boots with Vista by default and this bitch would destroy itself, in case it can reach any communication cable... I&#039;ll have to be double cautious :-(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, problem solved, thanks for the page.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just installed a Slack12.2 on a laptop with said chipset : the 2.6.27.7-smp kernel wouldn&#8217;t speak to the 100Base-T cable, mii-tool did not find anything&#8230;</p>

<p>Well, in fact the &#8220;workaround&#8221; is stupid : just boot with the damned cable plugged !</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t do this normally because the box dual-boots with Vista by default and this bitch would destroy itself, in case it can reach any communication cable&#8230; I&#8217;ll have to be double cautious :-(</p>

<p>Anyway, problem solved, thanks for the page.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back on Ubuntu on a Dell Vostro 1510 &#124; VT's Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-4644</link>
		<dc:creator>Back on Ubuntu on a Dell Vostro 1510 &#124; VT's Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-4644</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] A Much Simpler Fix for the r8169 &#8220;Link-Down&#8221; Problem     Bookmark and share: [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Much Simpler Fix for the r8169 &#8220;Link-Down&#8221; Problem     Bookmark and share: [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWS</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this, it worked for me with the following steps:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Boot with cable in eth1 (and assign the ip to eth1 also in the interfaces-file)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;When booted plug it into eth0 (change the interfaces-file, and restart network. link becomes ready)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Bring down eth1 (ifconfig eth1 down)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Link works again&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(where eth0 and eth1 will be the first/second interface)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is on a Gigabyte mobo with 2 Gigabit NICs, running Debian 2.6.18 kernel&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Best way to solve this is just upgrading the kernel :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, it worked for me with the following steps:</p>

<ul>
<li>Boot with cable in eth1 (and assign the ip to eth1 also in the interfaces-file)</li>
<li>When booted plug it into eth0 (change the interfaces-file, and restart network. link becomes ready)</li>
<li>Bring down eth1 (ifconfig eth1 down)</li>
<li>Link works again</li>
</ul>

<p>(where eth0 and eth1 will be the first/second interface)</p>

<p>This is on a Gigabyte mobo with 2 Gigabit NICs, running Debian 2.6.18 kernel</p>

<p>Best way to solve this is just upgrading the kernel :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorj</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-4533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-4533</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;rl8169 not work (((&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rl8169 not work (((</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Vuijk</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-4511</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Vuijk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-4511</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hard to believe though. It&#039;s been so long :)
At least the source from realtek gave me back 1000mbit for now. I hope not something else is still broken.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe though. It&#8217;s been so long :)
At least the source from realtek gave me back 1000mbit for now. I hope not something else is still broken.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-4510</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-4510</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It turns out it was fixed in 2.6.26-rc5, so I&#039;m all set.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turns out it was fixed in 2.6.26-rc5, so I&#8217;m all set.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Vuijk</title>
		<link>http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/2008/06/21/a-much-simpler-fix-for-the-r8169-link-down-problem/comment-page-1#comment-4509</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Vuijk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adam.rosi-kessel.org/weblog/?p=630#comment-4509</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like the net&lt;em&gt;device struct misses the member named &#039;owner&#039;.
Add #define SET&lt;/em&gt;MODULE_OWNER(dev) and it will compile.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like the net<em>device struct misses the member named &#8216;owner&#8217;.
Add #define SET</em>MODULE_OWNER(dev) and it will compile.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
