{"id":271,"date":"2004-07-30T16:12:00","date_gmt":"2004-07-30T16:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/the_law\/200_down.html"},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"1970-01-01T05:00:00","slug":"200_down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/2004\/07\/30\/200_down","title":{"rendered":"Two Hundred Down, Ten To Go&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> I finished the multiple choice part of the Massachusetts Bar Exam today. Now just ten essays, and by 6pm tomorrow I&#8217;ll be a free man, although not yet a lawyer. <\/p>\n<p> One of the basic canons of the multiple choice portion of the bar exam is &#8220;if the answer is a doctrine you&#8217;ve never heard of, it&#8217;s the wrong choice.&#8221; Unfortunately, a countervailing canon is &#8220;the bar examiners often like to use less-known synonyms for well known concepts to trick you.&#8221; (I made this canon up myself, but it&#8217;s true.) <\/p>\n<p> I got one of these today, and went with my intuition\/countervailing canon idea, and as I&#8217;m checking it out now, it turns out I was right. The &#8220;doctrine of after-acquired title&#8221; <em>is<\/em> equivalent to &#8220;estoppel by deed.&#8221; Well, it&#8217;s actually not quite equivalent, because estoppel by deed only applies to prevent the grantor from denying the validity of a deed, invalid at the time of the conveyance because the grantor didn&#8217;t have good title at the time but did at a later date after the conveyance, while the doctrine of after-acquired title is good against other claimants, but it&#8217;s basically the same idea. <\/p>\n<p> So, at least one right out of 200! <\/p>\n<p> (How many hits will I get in the future on a google search for <a href=\"http:\/\/google.com\/search?q=%22doctrine of after-acquired title%22\">&#8220;doctrine of after-acquired title&#8221;<\/a>? We shall see&#8230;) <\/p>\n<p> <span class=\"smallcaps\">Update<\/span>: Ari points out that a google search for <a href=\"http:\/\/google.com\/search?q=doctrine of after-acquired title\">doctrine of after-acquired title<\/a> with no quotation marks gives this blog entry as the number one result. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I finished the multiple choice part of the Massachusetts Bar Exam today. Now just ten essays, and by 6pm tomorrow I&#8217;ll be a free man, although not yet a lawyer. One of the basic canons of the multiple choice portion of the bar exam is &#8220;if the answer is a doctrine you&#8217;ve never heard of, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/adam.rosi-kessel.org\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}