EvidenceSubrin

LawSchool | RecentChanges | Preferences | Edit

(Sponsored Links, Helps Support Bandwidth Costs)


Difference (from revision 1 to current revision) (minor diff, author diff)
(The revisions are identical or unavilable.)
Subrin is a great professor in any class because he makes you think. There was a lot of reading for this class, and the exam is a monster, but if you have any leanings toward litigation or you want 3:03 certification to go to court while on co-op, this is an important class to have. And its required for the trial practices as well. There is a simulation you work with (kind of like the one he does in Civil Procedure but a little more involved) that was a lot of fun and it reinforced the subjects well.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This was a fantastic class to take. Subrin is a great professor not only because of his mastery of the subject-matter, but also because of his willingness to take control of class discussions and tell students when they are making no sense whatsoever. The latter ability allows for the class to move forward without a lot of unnecessary discussion. I felt like I had a solid understanding of Evidence at the conclusion of this course. The simulations were great and really help to ground the principles in practice, although the simulations could have been run better. As for the exam, it was kind of difficult, but I did not feel unprepared for it.


LawSchool | RecentChanges | Preferences | Edit

(Sponsored Links, Helps Support Bandwidth Costs)

This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited January 20, 2004 1:36 pm ET (diff)
Search: